Discussion about this post

User's avatar
KEN MORRISON's avatar

I've had a Garmin watch for many years and, yes, there are lot of data available. I ignore quite a bit. I keep track of my heart rate (particularly the Average Resting HR (usually around 49-50)); max HR; pace; distance. At almost 86 years old, I have learned to listen to my body so I use the data to aid me in my training for a race. Years ago I found you can locked into depending too much on data and not enough on what your body is telling you! Only use the watch as a tool .

Glenda Mitchell's avatar

It's interesting that you bring this up now. Just today I said to my husband - if I was relying on my Garmin data for motivation, I'd stop running. When I increase my distance, my Garmin decreases my VO2max, when I run faster my Garmin decreases my endurance. A training status of unproductive after a couple of tough runs is not a great motivator. If I help out at event as a pacer, my Garmin data is all over the place.

Having started dancing and then running long before smartwatches was a blessing in disguise. I learned to read my body and understand its unique characteristics. My resting heart rate is very low but my average when I'm exercising is high, so if I was going to make decisions based on that, I'd never get past a fast walk at best. At the end of the day, smartwatches rely on algorithms, not reality.

28 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?